HP Slate vs. iPad: Game Already Over
Ars Technica has this article on the HP Slate with specs and pricing, but no release date. It contains a slide purportedly circulating internally at HP comparing it to the iPad. Granted, there are still plenty of details to discover, and much could change before this becomes a shipping product, but my first read-over suggests to me that it will fail for exactly the same reason earlier Tablet-PC efforts failed: performance and battery life.
Battery life comes in at a paltry 5 hours compared to the iPads 10. Livable, but still not a day’s work which is the benchmark for me.
The real killer is the combination of a 1.66 Ghz Intel Atom Z530 and Windows 7 Home Premium. I have never been a fan of the Atom, and my experience with several different netbooks running XP or Windows 7 has not changed my opinion. While people insist you can run Windows 7 in 1 GB of RAM they are only technically right; you can also run XP in 512 MB of RAM but it will be a miserable experience.
Where Apple wins is being able to control the design of the hardware and software. This has always been the problem with Microsoft’s business model where constrained hardware devices are concerned. With desktop computers and servers you usually have enough performance overhead that programmers are no longer dropping down into machine code to squeeze every little speed gain they can because we’ve hit ‘good enough’.
I’m not against Windows 7. I do development work on it every day and believe that it is a good operating system – for full powered hardware. Anybody running it on an Atom chip with 1 GB of RAM is going to feel some pain. But my 2.8 Ghz Core 2 Duo with 4 GB RAM runs it just fine.
One thing they did get right: weight. At 1.49 lbs they nailed it compared to the iPad. In this case, however, two out of three is bad.


